Aim — To differentiate between Phase I, II, III and IV clinical trials using real-life case scenarios, and to justify the identification from the study objective, the participants and the sample size. Duration 45 minutes · 10 randomised scenarios · 20-mark rubric per scenario · Pass 50%.
A new medicine climbs a ladder of four phases. Each phase answers one question, and each exposes more people to the drug only after the previous phase showed acceptable risk. To identify a phase, ask in this order:
Use the sample size only as a cross-check — never as your first clue. Unsure on a scenario? Open “Need a hint?” in the station.
| Phase | Main objective | Participants | Typical number |
|---|---|---|---|
| Phase I | Safety, tolerability & pharmacokinetics; dose escalation to find the maximum tolerated dose | Healthy volunteers (patients in oncology / cytotoxic studies) | 20–100 |
| Phase II | Efficacy (proof of concept) and the optimal dose; further safety | Patients with the target disease | 100–300 |
| Phase III | Comparison with the existing standard treatment or placebo; confirms efficacy for regulatory approval | Patients — large, multicentre, randomised | 1,000–5,000 |
| Phase IV | Post-marketing surveillance — rare and long-term adverse effects in real-world use | General population using the marketed drug | Tens of thousands |
Watch the exception: a first-in-human study of a cytotoxic or oncology drug recruits patients rather than healthy volunteers — but it is still Phase I.
| Criteria | Marks |
|---|
Each scenario is auto-scored out of 20 and converted to a percentage. Justification combines the sample-size estimate (3) with your written clinical justification (2). Pass mark 50%.
Complete the challenge station and submit to generate your assessment, then write and submit your report.